He has nothing to gain, because he's afraid of death. If you're not afraid of death, you're in control of life.
The universe and I are declaring a truce.
If you hadn't noticed (and maybe it's not evident), I've been having a bout of nihilism lately. If you thought too much heaven was a bad thing, try too much nothing. It's not so healthy, either.
On Friday, I made a comment, the essence of which was - everybody thinks they are the good guys, but I just don't understand how anybody can think the good thing is to be a suicide bomber.
Message to universe: I'd like to formally put a hold (and possibly a retraction) on that question.
Have you ever reluctantly decided to do something, but become frustrated when it wasn't so easy, and thus, increasingly determined?
Have you ever done something you didn't want to, because no other avenue seemed even remotely possible?
Ever been in a situation so unacceptable that even a bad move is better than staying?
Somehow, Netflix sent me "Paradise Now," and it arrived on Friday. Can't even remember hearing of it, much less wanting to watch it. It's easier to disbelieve in mere coincidence. Sobering, to say the least. Would you hurt somebody to help them? Would you kill, for the greater good? (Do you know the greater good? Can anybody?) My question from Friday is all too easily answered. Hence the truce.
On the other hand... killing only gives the others an excuse to keep killing. Refuse to fight and they can keep slaughtering, but it quickly becomes clear who the victim is. Thus is the nature of peaceful resistance. In Israel/Palestine, who is winning? Who is losing? And, of course, why can't people just leave each other the hell alone? What if everybody quit fighting?
When you are fighting, no matter who wins, you lose. How is the confrontational mindset healthy to a human? Is it ever, nonetheless, necessary? They - wait, no, I - say that people will find what they are looking for. Love to fight? You'll find a fight. All things beautiful? It'll be inescapable. Pain and suffering? Just look around. Pick something - anything - look around, you'll find it. Try it for a week, with expectation that the seeker will find.
That said, logic goes back to the game that Andrew mentioned with manifesting things. Well of course it works that way but I really question whether anything changes other than perspective? And is a change in perspective good enough? At least, then, I can live in peace, even if children are starving in India, dying of AIDS in Africa, becoming trained suicide bombers in the Middle East, and on and on - if I can't see it, it doesn't exist.
Or does it go beyond logic? Can a skeptic really be successful at this experiment? But, like I said, I'm having a truce with the universe, at least for now. There seems to be something out there. (Is it good enough to be true to the moment, even if the apparent reality of the moment is only apparent?)
I have to wonder if this movie is meant only as propaganda, showing a sympathetic character to win over western minds. It certainly gives this one pause for thought. But what about the older people planning these things and sending kids to their deaths, kids who weren't even born when the conflict started? Pretty soon it will be the tale of two houses with guns pointed at each other... you know the story, nobody will be alive who remembers what started all this, but look at all the terrible things that have been done to continue it?
What if everybody just stopped fighting? Or would the few insist upon ruining it for the many? Is it truly possible to weed a garden? At the end of the day, we are still dealing with human beings who totally believe that they are the good guys. How can we really expect to argue with that? Once again, we find ourselves telling people, no, you're wrong, you're broken!
Meanwhile, the U.S. is still in Iraq, trying to let the people rule themselves. people are still fighting, still bent on killing. Why? Perhaps many of their sentiments are understandable and altogether human! Everybody, everybody is well-intentioned. What about the big picture? The American Civil War materially changed how humans were treated, but didn't enforce a different mindset - that is still a problem today, still changing today. Is fighting necessary to bring about such changes? I don't want to become a pacifist, but also fail to understand how fighting changes anything.
One quote:
Death is better than inferiority.
Is it?
Monday, August 21, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
The common solution to this dilemma in the past was that one side would totally destroy the other. Bloody, crude, ruthless, but a very effective method ending a conflict between two populations that can't coexist. And there you've put your finger on the problem - that mindset still exists. People forget their common humanity and kill one another over trivial matters such as beliefs, skin color, economic differences, etc.. The suffering of humanity is a bottomless pit. One has to start by stopping one's own suffering first, then you might be able to see a way to stop other's suffering.Then again, the Romans executed Jesus. The method they used has become a symbol for human suffering since that time.
The term suicide bomber is a misnomer. When has murder-suicide been given such a quaint name? When a man shoots his wife and kids, then kills himself, that's a horrible act, but somehow, mindwashing some young boy or man into blowing himself up and killing 20-30 innocent others is looked upon in a favorable light by some, sanitized by others, and condemned by many? I don't understand either.
No, we will all always be inferior to something, that we are not it is to live with, not die for. Peace is simple for the one who wants to keep fighting, very difficult for the one who doesn't want to fight.
No matter what, confusion or not, you are always an outstanding writer.
In regard to changing perspective and the reality of horrendous evils like children dying of AIDS and starvation, I would never say it's an enlightened perspective to choose (or to pretend) not to see it in order that I (the ego, the small--in this case very small--self) can live in some semblance of ignorant peace.
I would say that a change of perspective is "good enough" only insofar as it seems that we tend to live into, and according to, the perspectives that we hold. Or to put it another way, a change of perspective in itself isn't good enough, but it is the essential beginning of any change. And some perspectives are clearly healthier than others.
Ditto Jim, your writing inspires me as well.
Haven't seen Paradise Now.
I am happy you have made a truce with the universe.
Is death better than inferiority?
I guess if one is afraid of being inferior. It's kinda like the quote (forget who) "no one can make you feel (fill in whatever you wish here) without your permission." Easy to say...
It doesn't help that Western policy has denigrated certain peoples and cultures by exploiting natural resources for the last century...creating borders and arranging geographical lines as 'we' saw fit.
A policy is only as good as the power or force behind it. Look what Gandhi did- that's power. The West tends to use force, which always, always fails in the end.
I can't help but believe there will emerge within the struggle (whichever struggle you wish to mention) someone who will change everything towards conflict resolution and peace. Look at history; it has always been the act of one person that shifts the momentum.
It hurts me that we (USA) and our allies refuse to open dialogue. It is a most courageous act, to initiate and follow through with dialogue. It seems we aren't interested.
Happy truce-
OK- prompted by Andrew's response...I'll give you an answer I gave Akilesh when he asked:
“What of the child at this moment dying of untreated AIDS in a suburb outside Francistown, Botswana?”
We are thinking this child is someone, something other than ourself and we do not realize our passing, our transition from body to allness is a mere illusion mared within the throws of much crying and suffering.
This is not a child dying from AIDS, this is Spirit creating, recreating- we choose to see our little tale of birth and death played out in the child. This child, anyone of us, is merely Spirit playing hide and seek with Itself.
"Oh, there you are!"
++++++++++++++++
Don't usually spread this thought around too much because those around me think I'm nuts...but, it's what I know to be true...which is nothing.
Do I really believe this is all a game, an illusion, and that it must be played out this way or that way- Yes. It's my truce with the universe.
There is no death, there is no inferiority.
There is neither Jew nor Greek, nor male nor female, nor slave nor free.
There are no Muslims, no Jews, and (Christ knows!) no Christians!
Conflict can only have its source in the mind. It was "unfair," "wrong", "right," "desireable," "necessary," "just cause," etc.
As conflict appears first in the mind and manifests in the world through action,
Peace underlies all, reveals itself to the quieted mind, and manifests in the world through presence.
Presence is responsive to peace, and thus moves, but does not react. Its source is the deep current, not the waves.
There is no war. But there is undoubtedly the experience of suffering.
Sink below the waves. Breathe peace. Become peace. Bring peace with you as you surface.
In sleep, there are no terrorists, no jihadists, no capitalists, no communists, no Zionists. There is just soul without identity, recharging.
How very strange! Even our existence in manifest Creation, depends on our frequent and lengthy vacations from the world of stimuli and thought. The world alone cannot sustain us. Our nature must clearly be something else...
John, it never works, does it?
Jim, inferiority exists only in your mind.
Andrew, yes... sometimes the rest of the world is too much to take in, much less respond to.
Tommy, I'm flattered that you enjoy my writing. Yours is also wonderful, and I find myself going back and re-reading, at times. It's a good quote, and true; easier said than acted upon. People are people are people. There's an interesting recording at Adyashanti's website, about unified consciousness; your comment on Ghandi reminded me. The gist was that it's better to be for something, not against something else. I like that; cannot bring myself to be against things, anyway. One person. Like Tank Man.
The problem (well, "problem") with dialog is that it humanizes people... the more I learn about others' viewpoints the less I can bear to oppose them. Oh my, at that rate we might go accepting everybody! Everything! Oh, the horror! (mocking sarcasm ends. Do I laugh or cry now?)
Jon, you are dead on. Thank you, fondly.
Why can't we leave the past behind? Why can't we forget and forgive?
Julie-
I appreciate the heart of your questions. I may be projecting, but what I am picking up is - among other things - the desire to understand others... especially when that means understanding why people are selfish, violent, or otherwise.
And it goes without saying that this "understanding the other" is the very meaning of COMPASSION.
Thank you for your thoughts and for everyone else who have shared here.
May we seek understanding and compassion. Presence and peace.
What one of us does affects us all.
Imemine, it takes a lot to walk away.
Trev, thanks. I just wrote to somebody that I find myself increasingly unable to actually oppose anything. I'd call it empathy but compassion is a fine descriptor too.
It is all tied together, isn't it!
Post a Comment